The New York Times The New York Times Week in Review How much is your car worth?
 

NYTimes: Home - Site Index - Archive - Help

Welcome, - Member Center - Log Out
Site Search:  


Advertisement




Movies
How does Kirsten Dunst deal with the media’s focus on her love life?  

Read our exclusive interview with Kirsten.
Check out Kirsten’s new movie.


ARTICLE TOOLS
Email This Article E-Mail This Article
Printer Friendly Format Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-mailed Articles Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints & Permissions Reprints & Permissions
Single Page Format Single-Page Format

TIMES NEWS TRACKER

  Topics

Alerts
Airlines and Airplanes



Why the Big Airlines Can't Get Off the Ground


Published: September 19, 2004

(Page 2 of 2)

The low-fare airlines' operations are simpler and leaner; their labor costs are much lower; they do not have the financial burden of pension obligations to thousands of retired workers, a major expense for the older carriers; and crucially, they have not annoyed their customers nearly as much.

On the low-fare carriers, passengers are not pampered, but they do not expect to be. People who might be disappointed with the quality of a United meal - or resent being forced to pay extra for one on a Ted flight - do not seem to mind when Southwest gives them just a drink and a bag of peanuts, because that is all Southwest has ever promised them.

While a segment of the market is still willing to pay premium prices for a substantially higher standard of service, it exists now mostly on long-haul and international routes. Flights of just a few hours have become a commodity bought strictly on price, and the market won't bear the fares that the big airlines need to cover their costs. So, in their current form, these companies are not viable any more. The question for the traditional carriers now is whether they can transform themselves into something like the low-fare carriers, or find niches where they can still thrive.

US Airways and Delta have each said in recent weeks that they would drop hubs and eliminate thousands of jobs in an effort to rein in costs. Each hopes to make its operations more like their low-fare rivals. But those hopes depend on the willingness of their workers to accept new cuts in pay and benefits, and investors to pump in more money.

Once the public would have had an emotional investment in the fates of storied names like Delta and United: witness the anguished reaction to Pan Am's closure in 1991. But not now.

There was some sympathy for the airlines in the dark days after Sept. 11, but despite the bailout that Congress approved after the attacks, the industry is still in turmoil, and the continuing drumbeat of bad news has had a numbing effect on customers.

"It's been three years since 9/11, and I think they just have no energy to get awfully disturbed" about the traditional airlines troubles, Professor Cappelli said.


Home Delivery of The Times from $2.90/week - Act Now!
<<Previous | 1 | 2


RELATED ARTICLES
. Russians Cite Porous Security in Terror Bombings of 2 Planes (September 16, 2004) 
. Auditors Question the Viability of Delta Air Lines (September 16, 2004) 
. Those Who Reported in Vegas Stayed in Vegas (September 15, 2004) 
. Those Who Reported in Vegas Stayed in Vegas (September 15, 2004) 
Find more results for Airlines and Airplanes

TOP WEEK IN REVIEW ARTICLES
. Dark Age: Putin Gambles on Raw Power
. How Would They End the War?
. Desperately Seeking Dick Cheney
. Kerry's Lesson: Lambeau Rhymes With Rambo
Go to Week in Review

OUR ADVERTISERS